In order to have full access of this Article ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, please email us on thedocumentco@hotmail.co.uk
To identify whether that the given action learning program is an Organizational Development (OD) intervention, we must first focus on and understand OD itself. The most encompassing explanation of OD according to both Ramanarayan & Rao(2011)and French & Bell (2001), defines OD as “a long term effort, led and supported by top management, to improve an organizations’ visioning, empowerment, learning and problem solving process, through and ongoing, collaborative management of organizational culture….”
This definition is deemed most encompassing by Ramanarayan & Rao(2011) because of the evolving nature of the field of OD. As characterized by the authors, first generation OD focused on the micro aspects of a firm such as an individual or groups within the organization. Second generation OD paid attention to the macro aspects and hence included the external environment.
Third-gen OD built upon the previous two by including the organization’s past into the equation. The third generation OD strove for the concept of ‘learning organizations’ which continuously increase their capability to learn and therefore adapt proactively to any business situation. These learning organizations satisfied all criteria of the implementation tools in OD, namely:participation, self-reflection and also the Action Research Model. This meant that the new version of OD recognized that all efforts for change required involvement from all levels whether they may be individual or group and required self-evaluation from each of the organization’s members involved. Also, all efforts should be practical in response to organizational problems diagnosedthrough experiential learning.
The modern OD interventions exhibit the same characteristics as identified above. OD interventions as defined by Cummings & Worley (2007), are planned actions or events to help increase an organization’s effectiveness. Examples of OD interventions include encounter groups, awareness expansion, training, feedback, instrumentation, role analysis etcetera. All these interventions exhibit the features of being participative, self- reflective and are based upon or result in gaining of practical experiential knowledge. Also, since OD’s ideal is a learning organization, all these interventions are cyclical in nature i.e. these continuously evolve based on previous learning episodes.
Action Learning Programs are interventions which aim to solve organizational issues while improving individual development (Rigg, 2008). These programs incorporate action learning groups which are sets of six to eight people who meet often to solve a problem (Action Learning Associates, 2014). These are based on key principles which include personal development as a consequence of deep self-reflection; high degree of individual involvement exhibited through supporting and challenging peers; and questioning insight.All actions are based on experiential knowledge and the cycle of action leads to learning leading to action leading to learning again(Pedler, Burgoyne & Brook, 2005).
OD borrows heavily from the behavioural sciences and so does its interventions. The approach implemented in the given scenario is a bottom-up behavioural approach. It focused on the individual level of practitioners to solve an organizational issue. It paved the ground for self-reflection on individual skills which resulted in nurses aspiring for betterment. It focused on experimenting with solutions based on experiential knowledge (the action-learning cycle). It also rejected the hierarchical leadership model by introducing distributive leadership through empowering the nurses (Kellie & Milsom, 2013).
The benefits of this intervention included primarily an increased organizational effectiveness reflected in improved organizational performance (improved employee behaviour and sense of responsibility; improved customer-centric focus; reduced costs and fewer ulcers). Increased organizational effectiveness, without any harmful indirect costs (such as employee disillusionment) is the ultimate aim of OD. Also, this intervention prompted a cycle wherein effectiveness would continuously increase through a constant analysis of the weaknesses by the employees themselves.Hence this intervention can be conclusively classified as an OD intervention.
An organization’s culture is a very abstract concept, not easily defined but readily observable in qualitative terms. Kreitner&Kinicki(2008) define it as the ‘shared values and beliefs which underlie a company’s identity’. Ostroff, Kinicki&Tamkins(2004) identify three layers of an organization’s culture namely: observable artifacts, espoused values and basic assumptions…
Recent Comments