This article consists of 19 pages and 4260 words. In order to have full access to this article, email us at thedocumentco@hotmail.co.uk

Ref No: 53887

 

Introduction

Inguinal hernias are among the most common surgical conditions, affecting a huge number of individuals worldwide. This surgical issue involves a protrusion of abdominal contents, such as intestines, through a weak point in the abdominal wall, specifically in the groin or inguinal region (1).

 

The prevalence of inguinal hernias is a cause for concern. They happen more often in males than in females and are most commonly found in adults. Factors contributing to the advancement of inguinal hernias include age, sex, family history, and environmental factors such as heavy lifting and bulky body (2). The estimated lifetime risk for men is around 27%, while for females, it is approximately 3%. The prevalence of inguinal hernias features the requirement for compelling surgical interventions and the constant quest for improving treatment choices (3).

 

Among the various sorts of inguinal hernias, strangulated hernias are of particular significance because of their potential complications. Strangulated hernias happen when the projected abdominal contents become trapped in the hernia sac (4). This can lead to tissue corruption, infection, and hazardous complications are not instantly addressed. Thus, treating strangulated inguinal hernias is both dire and critical for patient results.

 

The field of hernia repair has seen significant advancements in procedures and materials utilised for treatment. Traditionally, hernia repair involved basic tissue approximation and suturing (5).

 

The utilisation of mesh in hernia repair has turned into a standard practice in many parts of the world. Mesh repair offers structural help, lessens the chances of recurrence, and often brings about a shorter recovery period. In any case, the utilisation of mesh in strangulated inguinal hernia repair isn’t without debate (6). The potential complications, including infections and chronic pain, associated with mesh repair have provoked conversations about its safety and efficacy in this particular setting.

 

This paper aims to address these worries by conducting a systematic survey and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mesh repair in strangulated inguinal hernias. It will explore the existing group of literature, assess the results associated with mesh repair, and add to a superior understanding of the optimal surgical approach for these perplexing cases.

Research Question

The research question for this study: “What is the safety and efficacy of mesh repair in strangulated inguinal hernias?”

Research Objectives

Objectives for this research are:

  • To lead a systematic survey and meta-analysis of existing literature.
  • To assess the results associated with mesh repair in strangulated inguinal hernias.
  • To give an exhaustive overview of the available evidence.

Literature Review

The literature review on inguinal hernia repair, with a particular spotlight on the use of mesh in strangulated inguinal hernias, is a key part of the broader investigation into the safety and efficacy of this surgical approach. In this segment, we will dive into the existing collection of literature related to these topics, highlighting key studies and their outcomes that inform the present status of information in the field.

A prospective study examining the results of mesh repair in strangulated inguinal hernias and their findings recommended that mesh repair could be safely and really utilised, even in cases of strangulation, with fewer recurrence rates and a diminished probability of complications (7). This study gave key evidence supporting the feasibility of mesh repair with regard to strangulated hernias.

Then again, research adopted a cautious strategy, emphasising the potential harms associated with mesh use within the sight of….